A Manhattan judge has dismissed the National Rifle Association’s countersuit against New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), rejecting the gun group’s accusation that it’s the victim of a political “witch hunt.”
In February, the attorney general’s office warned that advancing the NRA’s counterattack would give regulatory targets a new tool to “harry prosecutors.” Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Joel M. Cohen considered the competing arguments for months before ruling in the AG’s favor, but the blistering 14-page opinion suggests that it wasn’t a close call.
“The investigation followed reports of serious misconduct and it uncovered additional evidence that, at a bare minimum, undermines any suggestion that was a mere pretext to penalize the NRA for its constitutionally protected activities,” his decision and order states.
In March, Cohen delivered a mixed decision that allowed the attorney general’s office pursue certain claims — but took what he called the “corporate death penalty” off the table, a request to dissolve the more than 150-year-old gun group.
The judge made clear, however, that this did not mean he gave the NRA a clean bill of health.
“Although certain of the Attorney General’s claims were dismissed by the Court on legal grounds, they were serious claims based on detailed allegations of wrongdoing at the highest levels of a not-for-profit organization as to which the Attorney General has legitimate oversight responsibility,” Cohen wrote, emphasizing the NRA’s charitable status in italics. “And many legally viable claims remain. The narrative that the Attorney General’s investigation into these undeniably serious matters was nothing more than a politically motivated – and unconstitutional – witch hunt is simply not supported by the record.”
James celebrated the decision in a statement.
“Today, the court reaffirmed the legitimacy and viability of my office’s lawsuit against the NRA for its years of fraud, abuse, and greed,” she wrote. “For almost two years, the NRA has tried every trick in the book to avoid culpability for their actions, only to be repeatedly rejected by the courts. Our fight for transparency and accountability will continue because no organization is above the law.”
READ RELATED: NDIS: Group linked to organised crime accused of defrauding the scheme of more than $2million
The AG’s legal action surrounded the group’s alleged style of governance, not the group’s direct advocacy for gun rights.
James first filed a lawsuit against the NRA and four of its current and former top executives nearly two years ago in August 2020, accusing them of mismanaging funds, failing to follow numerous state and federal laws, flouting their own bylaws and policies, and contributing to the loss of more than $64 million in just three years.
At the center of her claims is the group’s executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, who stands accused of lavish living on the donors’ dime. When he filed a failed bankruptcy petition in Texas, proceedings there unearthed evidence that he bought $300,000 in Italian suits from a Beverly Hills Zegna, relied exclusively on private air travel for himself and his family, and availed himself of other job perks like an excursion on Hollywood producer Stanton McKenzie’s 108-foot yacht, “Illusions.”
LaPierre has generally defended such expenditures — even the seafaring — as necessary for his security and responsibilities. The other defendants include general counsel John Frazer, ex-Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Wilson “Woody” Phillips, and ex-Chief of Staff and Executive Director of General Operations Joshua Powell.
The NRA’s attorney did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment. The group’s claims are now dismissed with prejudice, meaning they cannot be refiled.
Read the ruling below:
[photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images]
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
Source:
