Give Johnny Depp ‘His Life Back’

Exactly six years to the day after Amber Heard filed a restraining order against Johnny Depp, closing arguments kicked off in a Virginia courtroom on Friday in the former couple’s bitter defamation trial.

Invoking that anniversary at the beginning of her remarks, Depp’s attorney Camille Vasquez urged the jury to give her client “his life back by telling the world that Mr. Depp is not the abuser.”

“You have been entrusted with a serious task,” she said. “What’s at stake in this trial is a man’s good name—even more than that, what’s at stake in this trial is a man’s life.

“There is an abuser in this courtroom, but it is not Mr. Depp,” Vasquez said. “And there is a victim of domestic abuse in this courtroom, but it is not Ms. Heard.”

On May 27, 2016, Heard walked into a Los Angeles courthouse to file a restraining order, and paparazzi captured a photograph of her apparent bruise for the celebrity tabloid TMZ.

An ex-staffer at the outlet, testifying over the publication’s objections, told a jury that TMZ had a tip-off about when Heard would appear and where to photograph the apparent bruise.

“She would pause for paparazzi, who got the photos that ended up splashed across newspapers and magazines,” Vasquez said.

The couple eventually finalized their divorce with a $7 million settlement in 2017.

Heard claimed she’d donate the sum to charity: half to the American Civil Liberties Union and half to Children’s Hospital Los Angeles. The charities only received a small fraction of the pledged donation, mostly from third-parties like Depp and billion Elon Musk acting in Heard’s name.

“The ACLU? They got less than $1 million, and the Children’s Hospital? They got $250,000,” Vasquez noted. “But that didn’t stop Ms. Heard from telling the world that she donated everything. Because remember: She wanted nothing.”

On Dec. 18, 2018, Heard’s byline appeared on a Washington Post op-ed titled “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change.” Though his name did not appear in the editorial, Depp filed a lawsuit noting that the headline, two sentences, and a paragraph left the distinct implication that it was about him. Heard appeared corroborate as much on the witness stand, and an email pitching the editorial to the Post said it was about how she was “beaten up” by Depp.

The op-ed ran days before the release of Aquaman, a box office smash that Heard argues would have been a breakout role.

READ RELATED: Killer Likely ‘Moved and Staged’ Delphi Murder Victims

Now, both Depp and Heard argue that their names have been dragged through the mud and their careers shattered.

Heard countersued after Depp’s attorney Adam Waldman called her allegations “fake,” “fraud,” and a “hoax,” inspiring what the actress described as a smear campaign.

No matter whose account the jury believes, Depp and Heard’s accounts cannot be reconciled. As each side tells it, the other is lying—audaciously and sadistically.

To chose one stark example from March 2015, the couple was in Australia when each one alleges that the other grotesquely assaulted the other with a liquor battle. Heard claims that Depp raped her with a whiskey bottle, while Depp was allegedly hopped up on eight to 10 pills of MDMA.

Depp, on the other hand, claims that Heard threw a vodka bottle at him, which he said shattered and severed his fingertip.

“When her husband was seriously injured and bleeding from a partially amputated finger, what did Ms. Heard do?” Vasquez asked. “She pursued him. She kept coming after him because that’s what she does.”

Depp alluded to trying to get away from her in an recorded conversation with Heard played for the jury.

“Most importantly, we heard from Ms. Heard about her assaults on multiple audio recordings, admitting to being physically violent with Mr. Depp,” Vasquez said.

This is the second defamation trial related to their dueling abuse claims to make it to trial. A U.K. judge previously found against Depp in his lawsuit against The Sun, a British tabloid that ran an editorial calling him a “wife beater.” The judge found the allegation “substantially true.”

This is a developing story.

(Screenshot via Law&Crime Network)

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Source: