The heading of Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett’s article (Formula milk advert restrictions are patronising – let parents decide what’s best, 25 August) will be music to the ears of the formula milk companies that, according to the Lancet, are spending between $2.6bn and $3.5bn a year globally on marketing, not including lobbying and social media. The Lancet showed that commercial milk formula marketing “frames normal maturing behaviours as ‘something is wrong’ – pathological – or mothers are inadequate” – for example, “if your infant has a rash or cries or possets or is unsettled – maybe they have an allergy” – and offers products as solutions.

With one of the lowest breastfeeding rates in Europe, the UK urgently needs to step up its control of marketing as well as its support of breastfeeding mothers – which is also inadequate. Cosslett is correct in saying that feeding is a woman’s choice, but to call restrictions on unethical marketing “patronising” is a gift to capitalism and rapacious profiteers. Parents strongly need accurate information and support, and the formula companies are in no way the right source of either.
Dr Tony Waterston
Retired consultant paediatrician and World Health Organization consultant



Source link

You May Also Like

My boyfriend knows I don’t orgasm – but not that I feel no pleasure in sex at all

I’m a 22-year-old woman who has never had an orgasm. Growing up,…

Mushroom magic? M&S introduces ‘shots’ said to bring you up – or down

First they gave us the meal deal. Now they’re trying to help…

Seeking Zen at a silent Buddhist retreat comes with its own challenges

As the taxi approached the remote Lake District house where I’d be…

Fun for ever! The simple way to build a fitness habit you’ll actually love

Only an idiot would claim to love every form of exercise. At…